SEO and marketing decision

Check Position

A single developer can build a useful rank-tracker (using existing OSS like serpbear), but reproducing the vendor's multi-datacenter precision, polished UI/mobile app, long history storage, and commercial support is significant operational work; keep paying for full product unless you only need a narrow tracker.

Visit website
Subscription$15/month ✓ verified
Initial build120 hours
Monthly upkeep6 hours + $100
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Check Position alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Schedule periodic keyword checks against Google (via proxies), store historic positions, present dashboards and SERP details, allow CSV export and a minimal API for creating monitors.

What it still won’t have

  • Polished mobile app and responsive UI polish
  • Operational proxy infrastructure and datacenter coverage (precision across 7 Google datacenters)
  • Built-in Slack support and vendor support
  • SLA, commercial billing, and fraud/abuse protections at scale
  • Years of historical data and analytics tuning

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 8 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Google rank-tracking SaaS using Node.js (Express) + Postgres + React. Core features in scope: (1) worker scheduler that issues Google SERP queries via a configurable proxy pool and stores ranked results per keyword; (2) datamodel for monitors, keywords, daily positions, and SERP snapshots; (3) REST API endpoints to create/delete monitors and fetch latest/history; (4) React UI to add monitors, view position charts, SERP detail comparisons between two dates, and CSV export; (5) simple subscription enforcement limiting keywords per account and an admin page to view usage. Out of scope: integrated payments/billing provider UI (provide hooks only), mobile native app, and analytics beyond basic charts. Require error handling for network/proxy failures, retries/backoff, tests for worker, API, and UI components, and Docker-based deployment configuration.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded