AI assistants and search decision

Cattus AI

A single competent developer can build a useful multi-model assistant replacement (chat, model switching, doc RAG, web search) in a few dozen hours using existing APIs and open-source UI/agent projects; enterprise features and bundled multi-model billing would still justify paying Cattus for teams.

Visit website
You pay

$16/mo

$192/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off76 h to build

$50/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Cattus AI alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • User sends prompts -> route to chosen model -> return response in chat UI (text + optional voice) -> optionally run web search or document RAG -> present images when requested.

What it still won’t have

  • Dedicated hosted multi-tenant instance and enterprise SSO offering
  • Vendor-negotiated access to multiple premium models bundled behind one bill
  • Production polish, UX, analytics dashboard and paid support
  • Any proprietary data or model optimizations Cattus may have

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal multi-model AI assistant using Next.js (React) frontend, Node/Express backend, Postgres for sessions/usage, and Redis for caching; integrate OpenAI/Anthropic (or pluggable providers) for chat and embeddings, a search API (e.g., SerpAPI) for web search, and an image-generation API. In scope: (1) model-selection routing and adapter layer, (2) text chat UI with message history and optional TTS/STT, (3) document upload → embeddings → RAG search, (4) web-search aggregation, (5) simple auth + Stripe subscription enforcement, (6) minimal admin view for usage and quotas. Out of scope: enterprise dedicated instances, SSO, advanced analytics, and multi-tenant hardened deployment. Include robust error handling, retries for API calls, rate-limit protection, and unit/integration tests covering routing, embedding+RAG, and auth flows.
How we checked4 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded