Learning and careers decision

Brilliant

A single developer can build a useful, smaller interactive tutor (lessons, feedback, basic adaptivity), but cannot cheaply recreate Brilliant's professionally authored curriculum, polish, scale, and ongoing content pipeline — so building is viable for a narrow replacement but not a full substitute.

Visit website
Subscription$24.99/month
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep10 hours + $200
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Present an interactive problem, accept user input, give stepwise feedback/hints, record mastery and recommend next problem.

What it still won’t have

  • Curriculum authored by award-winning teachers and learning designers
  • Scale, polish, and breadth of 40+ professionally produced interactive courses
  • Branded trust and large user community
  • Ongoing content additions and pedagogy research (AI Evals for Learning Games)

What remains hard

  • Brand trustBuilt by top learning experts from MIT and Harvard.
  • Execution qualityAward-winning learning that’s effective and fun
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 9 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal interactive tutoring web app using Next.js + React frontend, a Node/Express API, and Postgres. Scope: (1) implement a lesson player that renders JSON-defined problems with interactive visuals and accepts answers, (2) record attempts and timestamps in Postgres, (3) implement a simple rule-based mastery engine that updates per-problem mastery and selects the next problem, (4) provide basic user registration/login and progress dashboard, (5) provide an admin JSON uploader to add courses. Out of scope: authoring UI for rich visual editors, large catalog of polished content, and offline apps. Include error handling, access control, and unit/integration tests for API endpoints and the mastery engine. Document setup, migrations, and a single-command local dev run.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page — this pricing page renders its price in the browser! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page