CRM and sales decision

Attio

A competent engineer can build a useful, narrow CRM replacing core record management, search, imports, and simple workflows in ~30 hours, but Attio’s scale, AI agent orchestration, call intelligence, and enterprise features are not practical to reimplement cheaply.

Visit website
You pay

$44/mo

$528/yr

Per seat. Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$200/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Attio alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • A minimal, self-hosted replacement would store contacts/companies, ingest emails/calendar events, provide search and basic record views, run simple rule-based workflows (triggers -> actions), and allow exporting/importing CSVs.

What it still won’t have

  • Agentic multi-step AI agents and proprietary orchestration
  • Call intelligence (recording/transcription/analysis)
  • Large-scale reliability and throughput (MCP/API capacity)
  • Enterprise admin, SSO/SCIM, and audit controls
  • Built-in data enrichment and vendor-managed integrations catalogue

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scale2.6M MCP calls/month
  • Infrastructure at scale400M API calls/week
  • Brand trustTrusted by 30,000+ customers. From first agent to enterprise scale.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal CRM on Postgres + Node.js (Express) + React. In scope: Postgres schema for contacts/companies/deals/activities; CSV import with field mapping and dedupe; IMAP connector to sync one user's email and attach messages to records; full-text search using Postgres tsvector; a simple rule engine (record created/updated triggers -> actions: assign owner, update field, send templated email via SMTP); React UI to browse/search/edit records and configure workflows. Out of scope: multi-tenant scaling, call recording/transcription, enterprise SSO/SCIM, large-scale enrichment services. Include logging, retry/error handling for connectors, and unit/integration tests for import, sync, and workflow components.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page