Finance and accounting decision

Atlametrics

A technical person can build a narrow replacement (membership + courses + billing) in a few weeks, but reproducing the platform's proprietary analysis tools, live analyst services, and community/alerting features would require more product work and data, so keeping the paid service may be justified.

Visit website

Built by Valerio | Product Engineer, who ships 3 products in this index

You pay

$39/mo

$468/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off44 h to build

$55/mo3 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • A minimal paid replacement is a membership/course platform that serves gated video lessons, quizzes & progress tracking, subscription billing, a community link, and a simple analytics dashboard.

What it still won’t have

  • Proprietary analyst research and live calls / bespoke trading support
  • Atlatools analysis modules (on-chain, algo rebalancing) and bespoke alerting
  • Integrated Discord community moderation and server features
  • Performance-fee handling workflows described on the product page

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal membership course platform using Next.js + PostgreSQL + Supabase Auth (or Auth0), host videos on a video-hosting provider (Vimeo/Cloudflare Stream), use Stripe for recurring payments, and deploy to Vercel. Include: user signup/login, Stripe subscription checkout and webhook handling for at least two paid plans, a CMS-backed course page rendering video lessons, a quiz module with per-user progress saved in Postgres, an admin view to upload lessons and view subscribers, transactional emails (signup, payment receipts), and a small analytics dashboard (MAU, active subscriptions, lesson completion). Out of scope: building proprietary trading analytics (Atlatools), live group calls/video conferencing, and advanced on-chain tooling. Provide error handling, webhook retry logic, unit tests for payment handling and quiz persistence, and basic CI/CD deployment scripts.
How we checked2 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 56

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • 2 cited sources+1
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score56

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 2

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded