Finance and accounting decision

TermsFeed

A capable developer can build the core generator and consent widget within a week and maintain it; the main things you pay TermsFeed for are legal updates, polish, and brand trust.

Visit website
Subscription$10/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep6 hours + $0
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide a questionnaire-based generator that emits downloadable legal documents (HTML/DOCX/MD/TXT) and a consent-banner widget that logs consents and exposes webhooks.

What it still won’t have

  • Ongoing legal updates and regulatory monitoring
  • Legal review / liability protection and certified clauses
  • Brand trust and long-running reputation
  • Polished multi-language translations and edge-case vendor blocking

What remains hard

  • Brand trustHelping businesses since 2012.
  • Brand trustTens of thousands rely on TermsFeed to power their compliance solutions.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted TermsFeed-like generator and cookie-consent service using: Next.js (React) frontend, Node.js + Express backend, Postgres for storage, and Docker for deployment. In scope: (1) a questionnaire-driven document generator that composes clause-based templates and exports HTML/DOCX/MD/TXT; (2) a live editor with versioning; (3) a client-side cookie-consent widget (JS) that shows consent UI, blocks vendors, records consent events, and supports geolocation rules; (4) backend endpoints to store consent logs, export CSV, and send webhooks; (5) admin UI to configure appearance and template provisions. Out of scope: legal advisory, ongoing regulatory monitoring, multi-language professional translations, and payment processing. Require error handling, input validation, auth for admin, automated tests (unit + integration), and Docker Compose deployment scripts.
How we checked4 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 93

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score93

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page