Scheduling and meetings decision

Amie

A focused self‑hosted workflow (upload→transcribe→summarize→export) is realistic for a single developer in ~30 hours, but duplicating Amie's polished desktop UX, full integrations, and automation features is substantially more work.

Visit website
You pay

$15/mo

$180/yr

Not verified against a pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$150/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 11 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Amie alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Upload or record meeting audio → transcribe audio with an STT API → identify speakers and timestamps → summarize transcript and extract action items with an LLM → save notes and push to calendar/third‑party integrations

What it still won’t have

  • desktop floating/overlay recorder and bot‑free in‑call recording UX
  • deep, prebuilt integrations and polished one‑click exports to many apps
  • built‑in AI scheduling and automatic background recording
  • multi‑language speaker‑labeling quality and proprietary tuning
  • polish around shareable pages and team workflows

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 11 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self‑hosted minimal AI meeting notes web app using Next.js + Postgres + Supabase auth, deployable to Vercel. In scope: upload or record meeting audio, store audio in S3, call a speech‑to‑text API (e.g., OpenAI/Whisper or AssemblyAI) to generate timestamped transcripts, run an LLM (OpenAI/GPT or Claude) to produce a concise meeting summary and extract action items, map action items to calendar/todo items via Google Calendar and Notion APIs, and provide a web UI to view/edit/share meeting pages and export to Slack/Notion. Out of scope: native macOS/iOS floating overlay recorder, enterprise SSO, advanced multi‑language speaker diarization tuning. Include error handling for failed transcriptions and API rate limits, authentication, and unit/integration tests for transcription→summary→export flows.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page - this pricing page renders its price in the browser! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded