Writing and content decision

Weglot

A capable developer can build a useful, narrower replacement (automatic translation + serving under language URLs and a basic editor) in about a week; the paid product’s polished dashboard, enterprise features, and brand-backed services are the main reasons to keep the commercial option for larger teams.

Visit website
Subscription$17/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep5 hours + $50
Evidence2/3 runs agree

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Detect site content → send strings to a translation API → store translated HTML/strings → serve language-specific URLs and inject language switcher → provide a simple dashboard for editing translations and exporting

What it still won’t have

  • Hosted dashboard with polished visual editor and UX
  • Custom-brand translation model and training tuned by provider
  • Managed uptime, SLA, and enterprise features (SSO, dedicated proxy)
  • Built-in multilingual SEO automation and integrations across many platforms
  • Professional support, managed translators, and premium workflows

What remains hard

  • Brand trust111,368+ global brands rely on Weglot to translate their websites
  • Brand trustWebsite translation leader on G2 for 4 years in a row
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted website translation service using Node.js (Express), PostgreSQL, and a translation API (DeepL or Google). Include: (1) a crawler to extract translatable strings and metadata from a provided site root; (2) translation jobs that call a configurable MT provider and store results; (3) an HTTP layer that serves translated content under /{lang}/ paths and emits hreflang tags; (4) a lightweight dashboard to list and edit translations (text-only editor), and a language switcher JS snippet to inject into pages; (5) export/import of translations (CSV/JSON). Out of scope: WYSIWYG visual editor, custom model training, enterprise SSO, billing. Require robust error handling, retry/backoff for API calls, tests for crawler, translation job, serving, and DB migrations.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 84

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score84

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page