Project and task management decision

Tody

A capable developer can reproduce the core scheduling and gamified to-do workflow, but the complete product (polished native apps, store presence, and large userbase) is costly to match, so keep paying unless you only need a narrow replacement.

Visit website
You pay

$4.99/mo

$60/yr

Not verified against a pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$25/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 7 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Tody alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Generate prioritized cleaning tasks based on per-item 'dueness', present them in a visual list, track completions and adjust priorities.

What it still won’t have

  • Polished native mobile UX and App Store / Play Store presence
  • Existing user base and accumulated reviews/ratings
  • Cross-device polish and long-term product refinement (gamification tuning)
  • 30-day free-trial conversion funnel and subscription management

What remains hard

  • Brand trustJoin the 1.000.000+ others who already changed their lives for the better with Tody
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 7 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a cross-platform cleaning-planner web app (React + TypeScript frontend, Node.js + Express backend, PostgreSQL, and Firebase Auth or Auth0 for authentication). In scope: task/room CRUD with per-task cleanliness metrics, a scheduler that computes task 'dueness' and generates a prioritized to-do list, user accounts with device sync, a visual dashboard showing rooms and progress, a simple gamification layer (Dusty counter, points, monthly challenge), focus timer, push/notification hooks, and subscription check stubs. Out of scope: native App Store packaging, multiple-language localization, advanced analytics, and payment processing. Include error handling, tests for scheduler logic, and basic CI to run unit tests.
How we checked3 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page - this pricing page renders its price in the browser✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page