Project and task management decision

Todo.is

A competent engineer can reproduce the core AI-assisted todo app using existing open-source projects and APIs in a multi-week build; running costs and maintenance are modest, so building is reasonable.

Visit website

Built by Ezzaky Abd, who ships 7 products in this index

You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off60 h to build

$50/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Todo.is alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Create, update, complete, and list tasks with optional AI-assisted suggestions

What it still won’t have

  • Polish, UX and cross-platform native apps (iOS/Android)
  • Built-in analytics and integrations not implemented
  • Any proprietary AI behavior or bundled model the vendor provides
  • Vendor support, uptime SLAs, and brand trust

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Todo.is does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Todo.is replacement: use React for a SPA frontend, Node.js + Express for the backend, and Postgres for storage. Core features in scope: user signup/login (email+password), create/read/update/delete tasks, mark complete, list tasks with filters, and an endpoint that calls an external model API to provide a one-paragraph task summary/suggestion. Out of scope: native mobile apps, advanced third-party integrations (Jira, GitHub), team/collaboration features, and paid billing. Include Dockerfiles, CI for tests and deployment, basic input validation, error handling, and unit+integration tests for API endpoints.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded