Project and task management decision

Timely

A basic automatic-tracking + timesheet-review workflow is feasible for a single engineer in ~30 hours, but matching Timely's cross-platform agents, polished AI AutoSheet, integrations catalogue, and enterprise features would require much more engineering and operations investment.

Visit website
You pay

$11/mo

$132/yr

Per seat. Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$50/mo10 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Timely alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Capture app/activity usage on a device → send activity events to a backend → classify/assign events to projects (automatically or by simple rules) → present a web UI for users to review/approve timesheet entries → export reports/invoices or sync via integrations.

What it still won’t have

  • Polished automatic tracking across thousands of apps and platforms (wide OS + mobile coverage)
  • Mature AI AutoSheet models and accuracy claims
  • Large catalog of built-in third-party integrations and prebuilt syncs
  • Enterprise features: SSO/Azure AD, dedicated customer success, and scale-focused support
  • Polished UX, onboarding flows, and reliability/edge-case handling developed by the vendor

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal automatic time-tracking service using a macOS agent + Node.js backend + Postgres + React UI. Core features in scope: (1) macOS agent that records active app/window titles and timestamps and posts batched events to a REST API; (2) Node/Express API storing events in Postgres with deduplication and user/project tables; (3) simple classification pipeline (rule-based heuristics plus a lightweight ML classifier or embedding-based matcher) that assigns events to projects and suggests timesheet entries; (4) React web UI for users to review/edit/approve suggested timesheet entries and export CSV reports; (5) a webhook-based export endpoint for simple accounting syncs. Out of scope: mobile OS agents (iOS/Android), enterprise SSO, advanced AI AutoSheet training, and a catalog of 3rd-party built integrations. Include logging, retries, error handling, unit tests for backend logic, and an end-to-end integration test for event ingestion → suggestion → approval → CSV export. Provide Docker compose for local dev and deployment docs for a single small cloud VM plus managed Postgres.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded