Websites and hosting decision

Tilda

A small, useful subset of Tilda (templates + block editor + static publish + AI copy) is realistic for a capable developer to build and run; recreating the full polished editor, large block library, integrations, and hosted platform is substantially more work and operational cost.

Visit website
You pay

$15/mo

$180/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$50/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Tilda alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Create a page from blocks or a template, edit content (text/images/blocks) in the visual editor, connect domain/publish, and collect form submissions

What it still won’t have

  • Large built-in block library and hundreds of designer-made templates
  • Polished visual editor (Zero Block) with advanced responsive/animation tools
  • Hosted infrastructure, automatic scaling, backups, and uptime SLAs
  • Built-in integrations and one-click payment/CRM plugins
  • Built-in analytics, SEO guides, and platform-level team/collaboration features

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal block-based website builder in Node.js + Next.js (React) with a Postgres database and S3-compatible object storage. In scope: a) a small library of 15 responsive blocks (cover, text, gallery, form, CTA, footer), b) a visual editor that composes pages from those blocks and saves page JSON, c) a renderer that exports pages to static HTML/CSS and a Publish button that uploads to S3 and returns a public URL, d) a form backend that stores submissions in Postgres and forwards to an email/webhook, e) integrate an LLM (OpenAI-compatible) to generate block copy from a short prompt. Out of scope: WYSIWYG Zero Block parity, marketplace of templates, advanced animation builder, built-in payments, multi-site account billing. Provide input validation, error handling, unit tests for editor API and publish pipeline, and basic CI to run tests.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded