Project and task management decision

Teamwork

A capable engineer can build a useful subset (projects, tasks, timers, simple resource calendar, and basic profitability) in a few weeks, but reproducing Teamwork's integrations, SOC2 certification, scale, and AI features is not realistic for a solo builder.

Visit website
You pay

$13.99/mo

$168/yr

Not verified against a pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$20/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Teamwork alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Create a project from a template, add task lists and assignments, track time against tasks, schedule/allocate people on a shared calendar, and track budget vs actual to compute basic project profitability.

What it still won’t have

  • 150+ integrations marketplace and pre-built connectors
  • SOC 2 Type 2 certification and associated compliance assurances
  • Enterprise-grade scale, uptime SLA, and hosted backups
  • Advanced AI teammates and forecasting that integrate with third-party models
  • Vendor support, onboarding services, and training resources

What remains hard

  • Compliance and regulationSOC 2 Type 2 certified, with private data that's never used to train third-party models.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted Teamwork-like app using Next.js + Node (Express), PostgreSQL, Redis, and Tailwind. In scope: user/org auth, project templates, create project from template, task lists/tasks/subtasks with assignees and due dates, start/stop time tracker and manual timesheets, per-user availability calendar and simple allocation UI, per-project budget, configurable billable/cost rates, and a profitability report (budget vs actual). Out of scope: integrations marketplace, SOC2 compliance, advanced AI forecasting, and enterprise multi-region hosting. Provide REST APIs, a basic web UI, input validation, error handling, unit tests for core modules, and docker-compose for local dev and a one-page deploy README.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 57

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score57

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page - this pricing page renders its price in the browser! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page