Project and task management decision

Teamwork

A capable engineer can build a useful subset (projects, tasks, timers, simple resource calendar, and basic profitability) in a few weeks, but reproducing Teamwork's integrations, SOC2 certification, scale, and AI features is not realistic for a solo builder.

Visit website
Subscription$13.99/month
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $20
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Teamwork alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Create a project from a template, add task lists and assignments, track time against tasks, schedule/allocate people on a shared calendar, and track budget vs actual to compute basic project profitability.

What it still won’t have

  • 150+ integrations marketplace and pre-built connectors
  • SOC 2 Type 2 certification and associated compliance assurances
  • Enterprise-grade scale, uptime SLA, and hosted backups
  • Advanced AI teammates and forecasting that integrate with third-party models
  • Vendor support, onboarding services, and training resources

What remains hard

  • Compliance and regulationSOC 2 Type 2 certified, with private data that's never used to train third-party models.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted Teamwork-like app using Next.js + Node (Express), PostgreSQL, Redis, and Tailwind. In scope: user/org auth, project templates, create project from template, task lists/tasks/subtasks with assignees and due dates, start/stop time tracker and manual timesheets, per-user availability calendar and simple allocation UI, per-project budget, configurable billable/cost rates, and a profitability report (budget vs actual). Out of scope: integrations marketplace, SOC2 compliance, advanced AI forecasting, and enterprise multi-region hosting. Provide REST APIs, a basic web UI, input validation, error handling, unit tests for core modules, and docker-compose for local dev and a one-page deploy README.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 57

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score57

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page - this pricing page renders its price in the browser! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page