Cloud storage decision

Sync.com

A small team can build a usable, end-to-end encrypted personal storage and sharing workflow, but reproducing Sync's compliance certifications, enterprise admin features, polished desktop integrations, and brand-scale is impractical for a DIY replacement.

Visit website
Subscription$4/month ✓ verified
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $25
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Sync.com alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Upload files from a client, encrypt them client-side, store encrypted blobs in object storage, and generate secure share links that recipients can use to download and decrypt.

What it still won’t have

  • SOC 2 / HIPAA certification and related compliance guarantees
  • Enterprise admin console and centralized billing
  • Guaranteed 99.9% SLA and priority support
  • Desktop OS-level integrations (Finder/File Explorer cloud-files) and polished clients
  • Proven brand trust and a large existing user base

What remains hard

  • Compliance and regulationSOC 2 Type 1 System and Organization Controls (SOC) 2 Type 1 compliance built-in
  • Compliance and regulationHIPAA compliance Sync is committed to safeguarding personal healthcare information (PHI) by complying with government mandated regulations such as HIPAA
  • Brand trustJoin over 2.7 million people who trust Sync to keep their files private, secure, and always accessible.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 9 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal end-to-end encrypted cloud storage web app using Next.js (React) frontend, Node.js/Express backend, PostgreSQL for metadata, and S3-compatible object storage for encrypted blobs. Scope: user registration/login, client-side file encryption/decryption with Web Crypto, upload/download with resumable uploads, share links with expiry and optional password, account storage usage tracking, and basic audit logging. Out of scope: SOC2/HIPAA certification, desktop Finder/File Explorer virtual file system, mobile apps, enterprise admin console, and paid billing integration. Include error handling for failed uploads, encryption/decryption failures, and test coverage for upload/download, encryption routines, and share-link access controls.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page