Forms and surveys decision

SurveyMonkey

A single developer or small team can build the core survey creation, hosting, and analytics features cheaply, but you cannot replace SurveyMonkey’s paid respondent panel, enterprise governance, and broad integrations — so build a limited in-house alternative or keep paying for those capabilities.

Visit website
You pay

$30/mo

$360/yr

Per seat. Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$100/mo10 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

The code exists. It is not what you are paying for.

These 2 projects are real, published, and do the core job — and this page still says keep paying. What the subscription buys is marketplace liquidity, and none of that ships in a repository. Fork one anyway if you want to. Go in knowing what it does not carry. What stays hard ↓ · All SurveyMonkey alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Create a survey form, publish a shareable link/collector, collect respondent answers, store responses, run basic analysis/export.

What it still won’t have

  • Access to SurveyMonkey Audience (global paid respondent panel)
  • Enterprise admin, governance, and compliance features (SSO, dedicated data centers)
  • Large catalog of ready-made templates and advanced AI analysis
  • Built-in 200+ integrations and Connect hub
  • Offline mobile collector and offline sync

What remains hard

  • Marketplace liquiditytap into our global audience panel of 335M+ people in over 130 countries
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal SurveyMonkey-like survey service using Next.js for the frontend, Node.js/Express for the API, and Postgres for storage. In scope: WYSIWYG survey builder (create/edit questions and simple skip logic), public collector generation (shareable URL + QR), endpoints to submit responses and store them, basic analytics endpoints (counts, cross-tabs) and CSV export, user auth (email/password) and account-scoped surveys, error handling, unit/integration tests, and Docker-based deployment. Out of scope: paid respondent panel, enterprise SSO/advanced compliance, offline mobile collector, 200+ third-party integrations, advanced AI-assisted analysis. Provide deployment instructions, CI pipeline, and monitoring alerts.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 28

How the score was reached

  • Pay verdict base20
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score28

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page