Forms and surveys decision

SurveyMonkey

A single developer or small team can build the core survey creation, hosting, and analytics features cheaply, but you cannot replace SurveyMonkey’s paid respondent panel, enterprise governance, and broad integrations — so build a limited in-house alternative or keep paying for those capabilities.

Visit website
Subscription$30/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep10 hours + $100
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Create a survey form, publish a shareable link/collector, collect respondent answers, store responses, run basic analysis/export.

What it still won’t have

  • Access to SurveyMonkey Audience (global paid respondent panel)
  • Enterprise admin, governance, and compliance features (SSO, dedicated data centers)
  • Large catalog of ready-made templates and advanced AI analysis
  • Built-in 200+ integrations and Connect hub
  • Offline mobile collector and offline sync

What remains hard

  • Marketplace liquiditytap into our global audience panel of 335M+ people in over 130 countries
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal SurveyMonkey-like survey service using Next.js for the frontend, Node.js/Express for the API, and Postgres for storage. In scope: WYSIWYG survey builder (create/edit questions and simple skip logic), public collector generation (shareable URL + QR), endpoints to submit responses and store them, basic analytics endpoints (counts, cross-tabs) and CSV export, user auth (email/password) and account-scoped surveys, error handling, unit/integration tests, and Docker-based deployment. Out of scope: paid respondent panel, enterprise SSO/advanced compliance, offline mobile collector, 200+ third-party integrations, advanced AI-assisted analysis. Provide deployment instructions, CI pipeline, and monitoring alerts.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 28

How the score was reached

  • Pay verdict base20
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score28

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page