Analytics and monitoring decision

Statsig Pro

A competent engineer can build a narrow replacement (flags + basic A/B analysis) using OSS prior art (e.g., GrowthBook), but reproducing Statsig's scale, advanced stats features, session replay, and enterprise integrations would be costly and time-consuming.

Visit website
You pay

$150/mo

$1,800/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$100/mo20 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Statsig Pro alternatives, with the arithmetic →

Code Statsig Pro publishes itself

Not a way out of the subscription - these are the vendor’s own repositories. Worth a look for how they build, and for anything you would have to integrate with.

What a replacement has to do

  • Evaluate feature flag rules in apps, collect exposure events, compute simple A/B test metrics, show results in a dashboard.

What it still won’t have

  • Massively scalable infra and SLA-backed uptime
  • Warehouse-native deployment and managed real-time logging
  • Advanced statistical features (CUPED, interaction detection, multi-arm bandits)
  • Session replay and 3rd-party integrations out of the box
  • Enterprise features (SSO, RBAC, HIPAA eligibility, priority support)

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scale1+ Trillion Events processed per day
  • Infrastructure at scale99.99% Infra uptime for API & Console
  • Infrastructure at scaleMassively scalable infra
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted feature-flag + experimentation service using Postgres, Node.js (Express) for APIs, a React admin UI, and a small worker (Node) for aggregations. In scope: (1) a flag evaluation endpoint and lightweight JS/browser SDK that returns treatment/config; (2) an ingestion API that records exposures and custom events into Postgres; (3) a stats service that computes difference-in-means with optional sequential p-value correction and exposes JSON results; (4) a React admin to create flags, assign experiment variants, and view basic charts (treatment vs control for 1 metric, cohort filter). Out of scope: session replay, multi-arm bandits, warehouse-native integrations, enterprise SSO/SCIM, and trillion-event scale. Include input validation, error handling, basic unit tests for SDK and stats calculations, Docker Compose for local deployment, and a README with setup and run instructions.
How we checked4 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page