Analytics and monitoring decision

Smartlook

A useful minimal session-replay and event-analytics workflow is feasible for a small team to build and run, but reproducing Smartlook's enterprise-scale infrastructure, integrations, and advanced AI features is not practical for a single developer.

Visit website
SubscriptionCustom pricing
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep20 hours + $200
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Smartlook alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Capture user sessions (events + recording) from clients, store and index them, and provide a web UI to search and replay sessions and view simple heatmaps.

What it still won’t have

  • Enterprise-grade scalability and multi-tenant infra optimizations
  • Advanced AI anomaly detection surfaced by vendor
  • Native integrations with Splunk/enterprise products
  • Commercial support, guarantees, and long-term data retention SLAs
  • Polished dashboards and advanced filtering UX

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scaleContinue to leverage the tools you trust—session replay, conversion funnels, heatmaps, and journey maps—now within a robust and scalable ecosystem.
  • Integration maintenanceUnified enterprise-grade platform: Seamlessly integrated with Real User Monitoring, Synthetics, and other Splunk products, Digital Experience Analytics provides end-to-end visibility by correlating experience insights with broader performan
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Smartlook does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted session replay + event analytics service using Node.js (Express) backend, Postgres for events/indexes, S3-compatible storage (MinIO or AWS S3) for session blobs, and a React frontend. In scope: client JS SDK to capture events and DOM snapshots, ingestion endpoints, storage of blobs to S3, event indexing in Postgres, search API, session replay player (timeline + play/pause + jump to events), and a basic heatmap generator (aggregate click coordinates). Out of scope: enterprise multi-tenant billing, advanced AI anomaly detection, and Splunk integrations. Include input validation, error handling, CI tests for API endpoints, and end-to-end test of capture->replay flow.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 57

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score57

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page