Forms and surveys decision

Slido

A competent developer can build a useful, smaller Slido replacement for internal meetings (polls, live Q&A, realtime updates) using existing OSS form/survey projects, but replicating Slido's enterprise-grade integrations, compliance packaging, scale, and AI features would be difficult and time-consuming.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off46 h to build

$105/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Slido alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Create a live poll or Q&A session -> participants join (no login) -> submit/vote in real time -> host views live results/dashboard -> export results

What it still won’t have

  • Enterprise-grade SSO, dedicated success managers and advanced user management
  • Polished, long-built integrations with many conferencing tools
  • Scale and reliability of an established service used by hundreds of thousands
  • Proprietary analytics and product polish (UX, moderation workflows, branding options)
  • Bundled proprietary AI features (Slido AI) and enterprise compliance packaging

What remains hard

  • Brand trustTrusted by 750K customers worldwide
  • Compliance and regulationWe follow recognized security and compliance standards and provide SSO, dedicated Success Managers, user management features and more.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Slido does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Slido-like service using Node.js (Express), Socket.IO for realtime, Postgres for storage, and React for the admin and participant UIs. Core features in scope: (1) create events and polls/quizzes in the admin UI, (2) participant join page by short event code (no login) to submit votes/questions and upvote, (3) realtime sync of votes/questions via WebSocket, (4) moderation queue for Q&A and host dashboard with live results, (5) CSV/Excel export of results, (6) simple embed iframe and a basic PowerPoint/Zoom button. Out of scope: enterprise SSO, dedicated account management, advanced analytics dashboards, and large-scale multi-tenant optimizations. Provide error handling for network failures and DB errors, unit and integration tests for API and realtime flows, and deployment scripts (Docker + Kubernetes manifest or single-machine Docker Compose).
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 57

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score57

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page