Security and privacy decision

securenow.ai

A competent developer can build a useful app-layer detection and blocking prototype (alerts, blocking, dashboard, and LLM query) but reproducing SecureNow's proprietary IPDB, tuned AI verdicts, and autonomous managed agents requires data and models that are not available from the site and are hard to replicate.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off63 h to build

$200/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

The code exists. It is not what you are paying for.

These 2 projects are real, published, and do the core job — and this page still says keep paying. What the subscription buys is proprietary data and proprietary models, and none of that ships in a repository. Fork one anyway if you want to. Go in knowing what it does not carry. What stays hard ↓ · All securenow.ai alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Instrument a Node.js app to stream request traces and metadata → ingest and store traces/IP events → run detection (IP reputation + heuristic rules) → surface alerts & allow blocking actions → query traces with an AI assistant powered by an LLM

What it still won’t have

  • SecureNow proprietary IPDB community signal and scoring
  • Pretrained proprietary AI threat models and tuned verdicts
  • Managed autonomous agents that investigate and remediate around the clock
  • Polished production dashboard, alerting UX, and reliability of a hosted service
  • Hourly-updated 500k+ known-bad IP blocklist and managed refresh

What remains hard

  • Proprietary dataCombines SecureNow's proprietary scoring, AI analysis, bot detection, attack classification, and SecureNow AI IPDB community data into a single response.
  • Proprietary modelsReturns a comprehensive AI-powered threat report for any IPv4 address. Combines SecureNow's proprietary scoring, AI analysis, bot detection, attack classification, and SecureNow AI IPDB community data into a single response.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

securenow.ai does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted app-layer security monitor using Node.js (Express), Postgres, Redis, and an LLM (OpenAI or local LLM). Core features in scope: 1) lightweight SDK middleware (npm package) that captures request metadata, headers, route, session id and request body (configurable) and posts to a local ingest endpoint; 2) ingest service (Express) that validates events, rate-limits, stores traces in Postgres and large bodies in object storage (local S3); 3) detection engine with IP reputation lookups (local blocklist and external IP intel API), rule-based detectors for brute-force, credential stuffing, scraping signatures, and a scoring pipeline that emits alerts; 4) reversible blocklist management API/CLI to add/remove IPs/users and middleware enforcement that consults Redis; 5) minimal React dashboard to list alerts/traces, show trace details, and send Slack/email alerts; 6) natural-language assistant endpoint that translates user queries to database queries and calls an LLM to summarize selected traces. Out of scope: building a proprietary IPDB, training custom threat ML models, distributed multi-tenant SaaS orchestration, and fully autonomous remediation agents. Include error handling, input validation, basic unit tests for ingestion and detection logic, and docker-compose for local deployment.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 22

How the score was reached

  • Pay verdict base20
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-6
  • Evidence score22

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page