Analytics and monitoring decision

Rooftops AI

A technical user can build a one-week minimal roof-measure-and-estimate tool that covers the core instant-report workflow, but the full paid product—verified NWS storm history, photo-based shingle identification, and the trained AI assistant with agent features—would require additional data integrations and models that make a complete replacement impractical for a single developer.

Visit website
You pay

$28/mo

$336/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off38 h to build

$75/mo3 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Enter address → fetch satellite + elevation → segment roof facets → compute area/pitch → generate cost estimate → export proposal PDF

What it still won’t have

  • NWS-verified hail history integrated into every report
  • Shingle ID from a single rooftop photo with manufacturer/product identification
  • Roofy AI assistant with domain-trained chat, live web search, and automated agent workflows
  • Door-knock tracking, team seats/leaderboards, and the full AI Agent Suite (follow-ups/lead nurturing)

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 3 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal Rooftops-like service using Python FastAPI, Postgres, and a simple React UI. Scope: (1) accept an address and geocode it; (2) fetch satellite tiles and elevation data for the location; (3) run an off-the-shelf roof-segmentation model to extract facet polygons; (4) compute per-facet area, aggregate squares with a configurable waste factor, and compute pitch from elevation+facet slope; (5) apply a rule-based cost estimator that outputs a low/median/high range and confidence; (6) render a branded proposal PDF and provide email export. Out of scope: shingle-photo identification, NWS hail history ingestion, conversational AI assistant, team/seat management. Include authentication, error handling, unit tests for geometry and estimator logic, and deployment scripts (Docker + single small VPS).
How we checked3 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 62

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score62

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded