Project and task management decision

RescueTime

A technical user can reproduce the core automatic-tracking + reporting and Focus sessions, but they won't match RescueTime's years of collected data, cross-platform polish, and breadth of integrations without substantial additional time and resources.

Visit website
You pay

$9/mo

$108/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$0/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All RescueTime alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Run a lightweight background agent that records active window titles and URLs, send events to a server that aggregates and categorizes activity, show per-user reports and dashboards, and allow users to set goals/receive alerts and start Focus sessions which block specified domains/apps.

What it still won’t have

  • Years of historical activity data and derived baselines
  • Polished cross-platform agent stability and browser extension coverage
  • Broad third-party integrations and enterprise billing/invoice options
  • Brand recognition and large existing user community

What remains hard

  • Proprietary data3 billion hours logged
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal RescueTime-like service: use an Electron (or native) background agent to capture active window titles and URLs and send batched events to a Node.js + Express API; store events and users in Postgres; implement categorization rules in the backend, a React web UI for timeline/reports/goals, and a small admin job that produces weekly summary emails. In scope: agent event capture (Windows/macOS), backend ingestion and categorization, user auth, dashboard with timeline and productivity report, Focus session push to agent (simple blocking by domain/process), and weekly summary emails. Out of scope: mobile SDKs, enterprise SSO, payments, and advanced integrations. Include robust error handling, tests for ingestion and categorization, and deployment scripts for a single small VPS (Docker).
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page