Automation and integrations decision

Relay.app

A small team or single competent developer can rebuild a useful subset (workflows, AI steps, run history, exports) and self-host it; the hosted Relay product’s broader integrations, billing, and support are not reproduced.

Visit website
You pay

$19/mo

$228/yr

Not verified against a pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$200/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 11 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Relay.app alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Run user-defined workflows (trigger → steps → actions) that call AI prompts and third-party connectors, record run history, and export/import workflows and table data.

What it still won’t have

  • Built-in premium connectors and wide third-party integration catalog
  • Automatic subscription/billing handling and refunds
  • Priority support and transition assistance promised by Relay.app
  • Any proprietary infrastructure or scaling optimizations the hosted product provided

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 11 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted AI workflow runner using Node.js + Express, PostgreSQL, and a React admin UI. In scope: (1) REST endpoints to create/read/update/delete workflow JSON definitions; (2) a simple execution engine that runs a sequence of steps (supporting HTTP action steps and an LLM step via OpenAI-compatible API); (3) persistence of run history and step logs in Postgres and CSV/JSON export endpoints; (4) a React UI to trigger runs, view run history, and download exports; (5) minimal authentication (JWT) and Docker Compose for local deployment. Out of scope: enterprise-grade connector marketplace, automatic billing, multi-tenant isolation beyond a workspace field, and complex OAuth flows (except a single example provider). Include error handling (retries, step failure semantics), logging, and unit/integration tests for the execution engine and export functions.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 86

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Evidence score86

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page - this pricing page renders its price in the browser! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded