Automation and integrations decision

Relay.app

A small team or single competent developer can rebuild a useful subset (workflows, AI steps, run history, exports) and self-host it; the hosted Relay product’s broader integrations, billing, and support are not reproduced.

Visit website
Subscription$19/month
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $200
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Run user-defined workflows (trigger → steps → actions) that call AI prompts and third-party connectors, record run history, and export/import workflows and table data.

What it still won’t have

  • Built-in premium connectors and wide third-party integration catalog
  • Automatic subscription/billing handling and refunds
  • Priority support and transition assistance promised by Relay.app
  • Any proprietary infrastructure or scaling optimizations the hosted product provided

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 11 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted AI workflow runner using Node.js + Express, PostgreSQL, and a React admin UI. In scope: (1) REST endpoints to create/read/update/delete workflow JSON definitions; (2) a simple execution engine that runs a sequence of steps (supporting HTTP action steps and an LLM step via OpenAI-compatible API); (3) persistence of run history and step logs in Postgres and CSV/JSON export endpoints; (4) a React UI to trigger runs, view run history, and download exports; (5) minimal authentication (JWT) and Docker Compose for local deployment. Out of scope: enterprise-grade connector marketplace, automatic billing, multi-tenant isolation beyond a workspace field, and complex OAuth flows (except a single example provider). Include error handling (retries, step failure semantics), logging, and unit/integration tests for the execution engine and export functions.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 86

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Evidence score86

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page — this pricing page renders its price in the browser! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded