Websites and hosting decision

Reafolio

A competent developer can reproduce the core portfolio, video listing, WhatsApp lead capture, and basic CRM using available open-source projects; keeping parity with the commercial polish and advanced analytics would be the main work left.

Visit website
You pay

$9.08/mo

$109/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off60 h to build

$0/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Reafolio alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Create a profile and listings, upload property videos, share a single portfolio link, capture leads (WhatsApp) and manage them in a simple CRM with analytics.

What it still won’t have

  • Polished UI/UX and bespoke 3D theme polish
  • Built-in advanced SEO automations (Search Console, sitemap generation tuned)
  • Hosted reliability, CDN-optimized video streaming and large-file handling
  • Team and permission workflows at scale (if Elite-level)
  • Commercial support, uptime guarantees, and incremental product polish

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted Rails app (Ruby on Rails 7, Postgres, ActiveStorage with S3-compatible object storage, Sidekiq, and Tailwind CSS) that provides: 1) user auth and a public agent profile with a single shareable portfolio URL; 2) listing CRUD supporting video uploads (store originals to S3 and generate thumbnails); 3) custom domain connection via CNAME with automated Let's Encrypt SSL; 4) lead capture via tracked WhatsApp click links and a simple Kanban pipeline to assign leads to listings; 5) lightweight analytics (page/listing view counts and a dashboard). Out of scope: multi-tenant billing system, advanced team permissions, full enterprise analytics, and video CDN transcoding. Include input validation, error handling, background jobs for uploads, automated tests (unit and request specs), Docker dev/prod compose files, and deployment docs for a small VPS or Docker host.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded