Websites and hosting decision

Railway

A small team can implement a useful subset (git deploy, container hosting, TLS, basic DB, logs) with open-source components, but replicating Railway's global scale, high-throughput private networking, integrated enterprise features, and polished multi-environment UX is not practical for a single developer or small project.

Visit website
You pay

$5/mo

$60/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$20/mo10 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 6 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Railway alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide a minimal hosting service that accepts a Git repo or Docker image, builds the app, runs it in containers, exposes a public domain with TLS, stores attachments/DBs, and shows basic logs/metrics.

What it still won’t have

  • High-performance global private networking and 100 Gbps internal transfer
  • Integrated multi-region autoscaling and large replica/VM limits
  • Built-in PR preview orchestration and unlimited ephemeral environments at scale
  • Managed enterprise features (SSO, audit log retention, HIPAA BAA) and dedicated VMs
  • Tight integrated UI/console with 100+ API GraphQL surface

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scale100 Gbps internal networking without VPC configuration.
  • Brand trustJoin 2M+ developers building with Railway
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 6 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted app platform using GitHub Actions, Docker, and a single k3s cluster on a small cloud VM pool (e.g., 3 x t3.small). Implement: 1) Git-based build pipeline that builds and pushes Docker images; 2) a controller that maps repos to services and deploys containers with environment variables; 3) an ingress layer (Caddy or nginx) that issues Let's Encrypt TLS and routes custom domains; 4) a managed Postgres service with automated daily backups; 5) a lightweight web UI (React + Express) to create projects, view logs, and start PR preview environments. Out of scope: multi-region/global networking, enterprise SSO/audit retention, hyperscale replica counts, and proprietary agent functionality. Include error handling, retries for transient failures, health checks, and basic unit/integration tests for the build pipeline, deploy controller, and ingress routing.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page