Learning and careers decision

QuizGPT

A single competent developer can build and maintain a minimal Chrome extension clone in about a week; the vendor's value is mostly polish, payments, and ongoing updates rather than an unreplicable moat.

Visit website
You pay

$2.99/mo

$36/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$20/mo3 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 9 seats.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Detect Kahoot question on the page → extract question (text/IMG) → query an LLM for the answer → highlight suggested answer in the page UI → optionally auto-click the answer with configurable delays

What it still won’t have

  • Polished commercial UI and extension-store listing polish
  • Built-in paid subscription, Stripe payments, and account management
  • Stealth/incognito modes and ongoing anti-detection tweaks
  • Regular product updates and customer support
  • Any privacy or legal-risk mitigation provided by vendor

What remains hard

  • Brand trustJoin thousands of students using the best Kahoot bot to improve their quiz performance.
  • Execution qualityAlways Updated Regular updates with new features and improvements. Stay ahead with the latest Kahoot-solving technology.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 9 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a Chrome extension (Manifest v3) using a small React settings popup and a content script that runs on kahoot.it and common embedded Kahoot pages. Core features in scope: (1) reliably detect question and answer option text from the Kahoot DOM and fallback to client-side OCR for images; (2) call the OpenAI API (configurable API key) with a prompt template to return the best answer; (3) overlay UI that highlights the chosen answer and optionally auto-clicks it with configurable human-like delay settings; (4) settings UI for plan limits, toggles (auto-click, incognito overlays), and local usage counters; (5) error handling, retry/backoff for API calls, and unit tests for parsing and prompt logic. Out of scope: a hosted subscription backend, payment integration, and proprietary anti-detection evasion techniques. Require input validation, graceful failure modes when the page format changes, and automated tests for the extraction and API-integration code.
How we checked2 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 82

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • 2 cited sources+1
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score82

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 2

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page