Project and task management decision

ProofHub

A small, narrow project-management workflow (tasks, boards, comments, basic Gantt, file storage) is realistic to build and self-host given existing open-source prior art (OpenProject), but reproducing ProofHub's full, polished feature set, integrations, SLA, and support is costly and best avoided unless you need complete control or customization.

Visit website
Subscription$50/month ✓ verified
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $20
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All ProofHub alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Create and manage projects and tasks, collaborate on tasks via comments/proofing, organize work with board/table/Gantt/calendar views, share files and versions, and track time spent.

What it still won’t have

  • Polished enterprise UI and UX refinements
  • White-labeling, IP-restriction and SLA-backed uptime claims
  • Priority support and account management
  • Existing integrations catalogue and marketplace
  • Proprietary improvements and continuous product polish

What remains hard

  • Brand trustTrusted by businesses and teams around the globe
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted project-management app in Node.js (Express) + PostgreSQL + React. In scope: user auth and role-based access, project and task CRUD with custom statuses and simple dependencies, kanban board and table views, basic Gantt timeline generation, threaded comments with @mentions, file upload to S3-compatible storage with file versioning, manual time-entry timer and CSV report export, REST API and a single-page React frontend. Out of scope: advanced proofing/inline annotation editor, enterprise white-labeling, multi-tenant billing, and deep third-party integrations. Include input validation, RBAC checks, API tests (unit + integration), basic UI tests, and error handling/logging. Provide Docker compose for local dev and a one-command deploy to a single small cloud VM (NGINX, Node, Postgres, MinIO).
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page