Analytics and monitoring decision

Predigoal

A single competent developer can reproduce a useful hosted prediction service using the cited open model and dataset; it's a multi-week build but prior-art components make it practical to self-host rather than pay.

Visit website
SubscriptionCustom pricing
Initial build88 hours
Monthly upkeep6 hours + $100
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Predigoal alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Ingest match/team/player data → run prediction model → store results → expose API/UI for queries → scheduled data updates

What it still won’t have

  • Any proprietary training, curated datasets and model tuning the vendor may have
  • Polished UI/UX, analytics dashboards and user features
  • Hosted scalability, SLAs, and any paid data feeds or integrations
  • Brand trust, user base, and any commercial partnerships

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Predigoal does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted Predigoal clone: use Python (FastAPI), PostgreSQL for storage, and Docker. Core features in scope: (1) ingestion scripts to import the FIFA dataset into Postgres and normalize fixtures/teams/players, (2) integrate and run the open-source Elo+Dixon-Coles+Monte-Carlo prediction model to compute match win/draw probabilities, (3) a REST API to serve predictions and a simple React single-page UI showing upcoming matches and probabilities, (4) a nightly scheduler (cron or cloud scheduler) to refresh data and recompute predictions, (5) basic auth for the API, logging, and Prometheus-compatible metrics. Out of scope: real-money betting integrations, multi-tenant billing, large-scale auto-scaling, and mobile apps. Include error handling, input validation, unit tests for data ingestion and model outputs, and a Docker Compose deployment for one small VM.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 86

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Evidence score86

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded