Analytics and monitoring decision

Predigoal

A single competent developer can reproduce a useful hosted prediction service using the cited open model and dataset; it's a multi-week build but prior-art components make it practical to self-host rather than pay.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off88 h to build

$100/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Predigoal alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Ingest match/team/player data → run prediction model → store results → expose API/UI for queries → scheduled data updates

What it still won’t have

  • Any proprietary training, curated datasets and model tuning the vendor may have
  • Polished UI/UX, analytics dashboards and user features
  • Hosted scalability, SLAs, and any paid data feeds or integrations
  • Brand trust, user base, and any commercial partnerships

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Predigoal does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted Predigoal clone: use Python (FastAPI), PostgreSQL for storage, and Docker. Core features in scope: (1) ingestion scripts to import the FIFA dataset into Postgres and normalize fixtures/teams/players, (2) integrate and run the open-source Elo+Dixon-Coles+Monte-Carlo prediction model to compute match win/draw probabilities, (3) a REST API to serve predictions and a simple React single-page UI showing upcoming matches and probabilities, (4) a nightly scheduler (cron or cloud scheduler) to refresh data and recompute predictions, (5) basic auth for the API, logging, and Prometheus-compatible metrics. Out of scope: real-money betting integrations, multi-tenant billing, large-scale auto-scaling, and mobile apps. Include error handling, input validation, unit tests for data ingestion and model outputs, and a Docker Compose deployment for one small VM.
How we checked3 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 86

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Evidence score86

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded