Automation and integrations decision

POSTEVERYWHERE LTD

A narrow self-hosted scheduler (few platforms, composer, scheduler, retries, basic analytics) is realistic for a competent developer; reproducing PostEverywhere's full product (11 native integrations, hosted MCP agent server, AI studio and polished analytics/UX) is a much larger engineering effort and operational burden.

Visit website
Subscription$29/month ✓ verified
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep12 hours + $200
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

Code POSTEVERYWHERE LTD publishes itself

Not a way out of the subscription — these are the vendor’s own repositories. Worth a look for how they build, and for anything you would have to integrate with.

What a replacement has to do

  • Author a post (text+media) → transform/format per-platform → enqueue/schedule the post → deliver to each platform via platform APIs at scheduled time → surface delivery status and basic analytics.

What it still won’t have

  • Out-of-the-box reliable integrations across 11 platforms (edge cases & undocumented API quirks)
  • Hosted MCP server for direct AI-agent connectivity
  • Built-in AI Studio with image+video generation models and bundled credits
  • Polished visual calendar, analytics dashboard, and team/workspace UX
  • Official SDK, CLI and webhooks that are production-hardened

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 8 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal cross-platform social scheduler in Node.js + Postgres + Redis + React. Scope in: (1) OAuth-based connection and token storage for 3 platforms (Twitter/X, Instagram, Facebook), (2) a web composer plus CSV bulk upload that allows per-platform overrides, (3) a scheduler/worker (BullMQ) that enqueues publish jobs, performs per-platform API calls with retry and rate-limit handling, (4) a simple results table and per-post delivery status, and (5) basic analytics polling (daily) for impressions/likes via platform APIs. Out of scope: AI image/video generation, an MCP agent server, multi-tenant workspace roles, and support for all 11 networks. Include error handling for API failures, idempotency for retries, tests for scheduler and delivery adapters, and a README with deployment steps (Docker + managed Postgres + Redis).
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded