Automation and integrations decision

POSTEVERYWHERE LTD

A narrow self-hosted scheduler (few platforms, composer, scheduler, retries, basic analytics) is realistic for a competent developer; reproducing PostEverywhere's full product (11 native integrations, hosted MCP agent server, AI studio and polished analytics/UX) is a much larger engineering effort and operational burden.

Visit website
You pay

$29/mo

$348/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$200/mo12 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 8 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All POSTEVERYWHERE LTD alternatives, with the arithmetic →

Code POSTEVERYWHERE LTD publishes itself

Not a way out of the subscription - these are the vendor’s own repositories. Worth a look for how they build, and for anything you would have to integrate with.

What a replacement has to do

  • Author a post (text+media) → transform/format per-platform → enqueue/schedule the post → deliver to each platform via platform APIs at scheduled time → surface delivery status and basic analytics.

What it still won’t have

  • Out-of-the-box reliable integrations across 11 platforms (edge cases & undocumented API quirks)
  • Hosted MCP server for direct AI-agent connectivity
  • Built-in AI Studio with image+video generation models and bundled credits
  • Polished visual calendar, analytics dashboard, and team/workspace UX
  • Official SDK, CLI and webhooks that are production-hardened

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 8 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal cross-platform social scheduler in Node.js + Postgres + Redis + React. Scope in: (1) OAuth-based connection and token storage for 3 platforms (Twitter/X, Instagram, Facebook), (2) a web composer plus CSV bulk upload that allows per-platform overrides, (3) a scheduler/worker (BullMQ) that enqueues publish jobs, performs per-platform API calls with retry and rate-limit handling, (4) a simple results table and per-post delivery status, and (5) basic analytics polling (daily) for impressions/likes via platform APIs. Out of scope: AI image/video generation, an MCP agent server, multi-tenant workspace roles, and support for all 11 networks. Include error handling for API failures, idempotency for retries, tests for scheduler and delivery adapters, and a README with deployment steps (Docker + managed Postgres + Redis).
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded