Analytics and monitoring decision

Pirsch

A competent engineer can build a useful, privacy-first analytics replacement using existing open-source components within a few weeks; Pirsch's enterprise features and managed services justify paying for scale and support.

Visit website
Subscription$6/month ✓ verified
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep8 hours + $0
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Collect pageviews via a small client script → ingest events via HTTP API → store anonymized events in a database → aggregate queries for dashboards → render a filtered dashboard with basic session views and CSV export

What it still won’t have

  • Advanced enterprise features (SAML SSO, managed cloud/on-premise options)
  • Extensive white-labeling, custom domains, and advanced theming
  • Priority/managed support and onboarding
  • Built-in advanced funnels/A/B flows and URL shortener (unless implemented separately)
  • High-scale infra and multi-region hosting out of the box

What remains hard

  • Compliance and regulationPrivacy-friendly web analytics made and hosted in Germany 🇩🇪, Europe 🇪🇺 — powerful, cookie-free, and fully compliant with GDPR, CCPA, and PECR.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal privacy-first web analytics service using: Node.js (Express) backend, Postgres for event storage, a small vanilla JS tracking script, and a React frontend. In-scope: cookieless client script that hashes/anonymizes identifiers; ingest API with validation and basic rate-limiting; store raw events in Postgres; nightly aggregation jobs for daily/hourly metrics; REST endpoints for filtered queries and CSV export; SPA dashboard showing totals, trends, basic funnels, session drilldowns, and site management (one site). Out of scope: white-labeling, SAML SSO, managed cloud. Include logging, error handling, basic tests for ingest and aggregation, and a Docker Compose setup for local dev and a deployment guide for a single VPS (Postgres + app).
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page