Analytics and monitoring decision

Pirsch

A competent engineer can build a useful, privacy-first analytics replacement using existing open-source components within a few weeks; Pirsch's enterprise features and managed services justify paying for scale and support.

Visit website
You pay

$6/mo

$72/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$0/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Pirsch alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Collect pageviews via a small client script → ingest events via HTTP API → store anonymized events in a database → aggregate queries for dashboards → render a filtered dashboard with basic session views and CSV export

What it still won’t have

  • Advanced enterprise features (SAML SSO, managed cloud/on-premise options)
  • Extensive white-labeling, custom domains, and advanced theming
  • Priority/managed support and onboarding
  • Built-in advanced funnels/A/B flows and URL shortener (unless implemented separately)
  • High-scale infra and multi-region hosting out of the box

What remains hard

  • Compliance and regulationPrivacy-friendly web analytics made and hosted in Germany 🇩🇪, Europe 🇪🇺 — powerful, cookie-free, and fully compliant with GDPR, CCPA, and PECR.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal privacy-first web analytics service using: Node.js (Express) backend, Postgres for event storage, a small vanilla JS tracking script, and a React frontend. In-scope: cookieless client script that hashes/anonymizes identifiers; ingest API with validation and basic rate-limiting; store raw events in Postgres; nightly aggregation jobs for daily/hourly metrics; REST endpoints for filtered queries and CSV export; SPA dashboard showing totals, trends, basic funnels, session drilldowns, and site management (one site). Out of scope: white-labeling, SAML SSO, managed cloud. Include logging, error handling, basic tests for ingest and aggregation, and a Docker Compose setup for local dev and a deployment guide for a single VPS (Postgres + app).
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page