Analytics and monitoring decision

Piqo Analytics

A competent developer can reproduce Piqo's core analytics, event pipeline and dashboards (several mature open-source projects exist), but matching the full hosted product (polished real-time UX, multi-provider revenue stitching, Ask AI at scale, managed EU hosting and SLAs) is more work and operationally heavier than a minimal self-hosted replacement.

Visit website

Built by Mohd Danish, who ships 3 products in this index

You pay

$9/mo

$108/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off76 h to build

$30/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Piqo Analytics alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Collect pageviews and click events via a small JS tracker → ingest and dedupe events server-side → stitch payment events back to visitor IDs via Stripe/Paddle APIs → store events in a columnar store → run queries/aggregations for dashboards and simple natural-language answers.

What it still won’t have

  • Polished live visitor map and instant real-time UX at scale
  • Built-in, tuned revenue-attribution workflows and multi-provider stitching as shipped
  • Hosted EU data option and SLA-grade hosting
  • Polished Ask AI with automatic insight digests and built-in prompts

What remains hard

  • Brand trustPrivacy-first analytics, built in the open.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 5 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted privacy-first web analytics service using: Next.js + React dashboard, ClickHouse (or Postgres+materialized views) for event storage, a small Node/Express ingestion API, and a 1KB tracker script served from a CDN subdomain. In scope: JS tracker (auto-capture clicks, pageviews), ingestion endpoint (dedupe, bot detection, daily-rotating hashed visitor IDs), Stripe/Paddle webhook consumer that links payments to visitor IDs, aggregation queries for channels/pages/funnels, a real-time visitor list (WebSocket), CSV export, and a simple 'Ask AI' endpoint that runs parameterized aggregations and calls an external LLM (configurable API key). Out of scope: multi-tenant billing UI, EU-hosting managed plan, advanced ML insights. Include error handling, request validation, webhook signature verification, tests for ingestion and stitching, and deployment scripts (Docker + Docker Compose or Terraform for cloud).
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page