Learning and careers decision

PE Games

A single capable developer can build a useful replacement (AI generator + saved library + big-screen UI) in about a week; the vendor's main durable advantage is teacher authorship/brand, not technical barriers.

Visit website

Built by mrrobbo, who ships 4 products in this index

You pay

$1.58/mo

$19/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off36 h to build

$50/mo3 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 37 seats.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • User supplies year level, equipment, space, time (and optionally curriculum/teaching approach); system calls an LLM to generate a game or full lesson plan, stores the result in a per-user library, allows PDF export and a fullscreen 'big screen' presentation mode.

What it still won’t have

  • Native iOS/Android apps and offline saved-library behavior
  • Curated teacher-trusted library and editorial quality
  • Multi-language support and polished UX of the commercial app
  • Subscription management and secure checkout handled by the vendor

What remains hard

  • Brand trust
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 37 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a single-developer web app (React frontend, Node/Express backend, Postgres DB) that provides: 1) an AI Game Generator endpoint (integrate OpenAI-style LLM) accepting year level, equipment, space, time, curriculum/teaching approach and returning structured rules/setup/variations; 2) user accounts and a per-user library stored in Postgres; 3) a simple UI to generate, view, save, and list games/lesson plans; 4) PDF export of a saved lesson plan; 5) a fullscreen 'Big Screen' presentation view for classroom display. Out of scope: native iOS/Android apps, offline sync, multi-language translation, and advanced editorial curation. Include error handling for API failures, input validation, unit tests for backend endpoints, and deployment scripts (Docker + basic CI).
How we checked2 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 82

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • 2 cited sources+1
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score82

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 2

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded