Forms and surveys decision

Outgrow

A capable developer can build a narrow, embeddable quiz/calculator + lead-capture workflow in about a week, but reproducing Outgrow's breadth (templates, integrations, enterprise hosting/security and 24/7 support) and audited compliance is much harder and costly.

Visit website
Subscription$22/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep6 hours + $30
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Create an embeddable interactive content piece (quiz or calculator), capture lead info, compute personalized results, store submissions, and display basic per-piece analytics.

What it still won’t have

  • Large template library and design polish (1000+ templates)
  • Native catalog of 1000+ third-party integrations
  • Hosted embedding, SLA, and 24/7 support
  • SOC 2 compliance and related audited security controls
  • Advanced features: real-time charts, PDF generation, custom JS/CSS editors, and team/agency workflows

What remains hard

  • Compliance and regulationSOC 2 Type II Certified
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build an embeddable interactive-content service using Next.js (React) frontend, Node.js + Express API, and Postgres. Scope: a small authoring UI to create quizzes/calculators with question types (single/multi-select, numeric slider, text), conditional branching, result mappings, lead-capture form, embeddable JS widget (iframe fallback), server-side storage of submissions, and an analytics page showing per-piece views, submissions, and funnel drop-offs. Out of scope: multi-tenant billing, 1000+ templates, SOC2 audit, and enterprise integrations. Include validation, error handling, end-to-end tests, and basic deployment scripts (Docker + Managed Postgres + Vercel or DigitalOcean app), and provide scripts to export submissions as CSV.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page