Project and task management decision

Orchestra

A competent developer or small team can reproduce Orchestra's core (white-labeled portal, Stripe subscriptions, task boards, docs) within reasonable effort; the vendor's managed hosting, support and polish are the main reasons to keep paying.

Visit website
You pay

$25/mo

$300/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off56 h to build

$20/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Orchestra alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Onboard a client, accept subscription payments, create and manage tasks (kanban), collaborate via comments and share documents through a branded client portal.

What it still won’t have

  • Managed hosting, uptime guarantees and platform-level backups
  • Vendor-run security updates, incident response and compliance work
  • Dedicated support, onboarding help and migration assistance
  • Polished integrations and built-in Slack/dedicated support channels
  • Ongoing product improvements and roadmap delivered by vendor

What remains hard

  • Brand trustTrusted by agencies like and 700 + others.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal white-labeled agency client portal using Next.js (React) + Node (Express) API, Postgres (hosted), Prisma ORM, Stripe for subscriptions, SendGrid for email, and Docker + DigitalOcean (or Railway) for hosting. Core features in scope: multi-tenant accounts with custom domain and branding per tenant, Stripe subscription flow and webhook-driven automatic onboarding, Kanban task boards with task CRUD, comments, simple notion-like documents (Markdown editor + file uploads to S3-compatible storage), email notifications and real-time task updates via WebSocket, basic analytics (MRR, active customers). Out of scope: Slack channel support, advanced granular permissions, migration tools from Orchestra. Include input validation, retry/error handling for webhooks and payments, unit tests for API routes, basic E2E tests for signup/payment/kanban flows, CI pipeline, and Docker deployment scripts.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page