Forms and surveys decision

Orbit AI

A capable engineer can build a useful subset (forms + basic scheduling + LLM classification) in a few weeks using existing libraries, but reproducing the full polished product with 20+ integrations, AI agent nodes, analytics and support is heavy—so build a narrow replacement, keep paying for the full platform.

Visit website

Built by Grant Cooper, who ships 4 products in this index

You pay

$29/mo

$348/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off116 h to build

$100/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Orbit AI alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Collect submission via an embeddable form, enrich and classify the lead with an external LLM, persist contact and submission in a database, offer calendar booking that writes to Google/Outlook calendar, and trigger outbound or webhook automations.

What it still won’t have

  • Polished multi-tenant UI and designer-grade drag-and-drop experience
  • Built-in AI agent nodes and pre-baked Claude integrations
  • All 20+ built integrations and single-vendor support/SLA
  • Enterprise features (custom domains, advanced analytics dashboards, A/B testing)
  • Priority support, dedicated onboarding, and bot protection out of the box

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 4 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal OrbitForms replacement: use React (Vite) frontend, Node.js (Express) API, and Postgres for storage; deploy backend on Heroku/Render and frontend on Vercel. Implement: embeddable form rendering, multi-page flows, conditional logic, file upload to S3, submissions/contact DB, Google Calendar OAuth booking (single-user sync), LLM-based lead classification via a hosted API (OpenAI/Anthropic), simple workflow runner supporting delays and webhooks, CSV export and basic analytics (counts, conversion rate). Out of scope: multi-tenant billing, A/B testing UI, SMS provider integration, deep admin/role-based enterprise features. Include input validation, OAuth error handling, retries for external API calls, unit tests for core APIs, and integration tests for booking and classification flows.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded