Forms and surveys decision

Opinion Stage

A narrow, self-hosted quiz/poll core (embed widget + storage + basic analytics) is realistic for a single developer in ~30 hours, but reproducing Opinion Stage's polished no-code builder, AI features, integrations, and scale is non-trivial and justifies staying on the paid product for most teams.

Visit website
Subscription$32/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep6 hours + $50
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Serve an embeddable interactive quiz, collect responses, show result/outcome, and view simple analytics

What it still won’t have

  • Mature no-code UI builder with templates and WYSIWYG styling
  • Built-in AI quiz generation and advanced analytics
  • Large-scale response quotas, CDN-optimized global delivery and hardened anti-bot features
  • Prebuilt integrations and managed support/onboarding

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build an embeddable quiz service using React for the widget, Node.js/Express for the API, and Postgres for storage. Scope: (1) a JS embed snippet that loads a React quiz widget supporting multiple-choice questions, branching logic, and outcome pages; (2) authenticated admin UI to create/edit a quiz (title, questions, answer→outcome mapping), list quizzes, and view/download responses as CSV; (3) backend endpoints to publish quizzes, receive and store responses, and a webhook endpoint to POST responses to a configured URL; (4) simple analytics: total responses and drop-off per question; (5) deployable to a single VPS (Docker), with migrations, environment config, basic tests (unit for branching logic, integration for response flow), error handling, input validation, and TLS. Out of scope: rich WYSIWYG styling builder, AI generation, multi-tenant billing, GDPR/legal contracts, large-scale CDN edge distribution.
How we checked5 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded