Analytics and monitoring decision

Oncrawl

Build a narrow self-hosted crawler+analysis for a single site is realistic in about a week; replacing Oncrawl’s full enterprise-scale, unsampled data platform and managed AI lenses is not practical for a single developer.

Visit website
SubscriptionCustom pricing
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep12 hours + $0
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Crawl a target site, parse and index pages; ingest and parse web server logs; correlate crawl and log data and compute basic SEO metrics (indexability, internal links, orphan pages, response codes); surface prioritized issues and generate exportable reports; provide a minimal REST endpoint to trigger crawls and download results.

What it still won’t have

  • large-scale crawling and log-processing capacity
  • unsampled enterprise-scale data guarantees
  • prebuilt AI Search Lens and Content Lens analyses
  • managed integrations and enterprise support
  • ability to process very large sites (millions of URLs) at scale

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scale+300M URLs crawled (JS)
  • Infrastructure at scale+500M log lines processed daily
  • Brand trust"I'd recommend Oncrawl for technical SEO challenges."
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Oncrawl does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted technical SEO tool using Node.js (crawler using Playwright), Python (analysis jobs), Postgres for storage, and React for a small dashboard. In scope: headless crawling with JS rendering, link and metadata extraction, server-log ingestion parser, jobs to compute indexability, internal-link graph metrics, orphan-page detection, simple content-quality heuristics, CSV export, and REST endpoints to trigger crawls and fetch reports. Out of scope: distributed scalable crawling for millions of URLs, enterprise multi-tenant billing, and advanced AI lenses. Include error handling, retry/backoff for fetches, unit tests for parsers and analysis logic, and Docker Compose for local deployment.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 57

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score57

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page