Analytics and monitoring decision

Oncrawl

Build a narrow self-hosted crawler+analysis for a single site is realistic in about a week; replacing Oncrawl’s full enterprise-scale, unsampled data platform and managed AI lenses is not practical for a single developer.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$0/mo12 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Oncrawl alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Crawl a target site, parse and index pages; ingest and parse web server logs; correlate crawl and log data and compute basic SEO metrics (indexability, internal links, orphan pages, response codes); surface prioritized issues and generate exportable reports; provide a minimal REST endpoint to trigger crawls and download results.

What it still won’t have

  • large-scale crawling and log-processing capacity
  • unsampled enterprise-scale data guarantees
  • prebuilt AI Search Lens and Content Lens analyses
  • managed integrations and enterprise support
  • ability to process very large sites (millions of URLs) at scale

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scale+300M URLs crawled (JS)
  • Infrastructure at scale+500M log lines processed daily
  • Brand trust"I'd recommend Oncrawl for technical SEO challenges."
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Oncrawl does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted technical SEO tool using Node.js (crawler using Playwright), Python (analysis jobs), Postgres for storage, and React for a small dashboard. In scope: headless crawling with JS rendering, link and metadata extraction, server-log ingestion parser, jobs to compute indexability, internal-link graph metrics, orphan-page detection, simple content-quality heuristics, CSV export, and REST endpoints to trigger crawls and fetch reports. Out of scope: distributed scalable crawling for millions of URLs, enterprise multi-tenant billing, and advanced AI lenses. Include error handling, retry/backoff for fetches, unit tests for parsers and analysis logic, and Docker Compose for local deployment.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 57

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score57

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page