Security and privacy decision

Okta Workforce Identity

Keep paying — Okta's value depends on scale, a vast integration network, enterprise SLAs, and specialized governance features that a small team cannot realistically replicate and maintain.

Visit website
You pay

$6/mo

$72/yr

Per seat. Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$230/mo25 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 40 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Okta Workforce Identity alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Authenticate users (SSO/OIDC), enforce MFA, maintain a user directory, issue and validate tokens, and provide an admin UI for user and app provisioning.

What it still won’t have

  • Large, battle-tested integrations catalogue (Okta Integration Network)
  • Enterprise-grade scale and uptime (hundreds of millions of users at scale)
  • Vendor reputation, certifications, and enterprise SLAs
  • Advanced identity threat detection, posture management, and privileged access features
  • Okta-specific AI-agent runtime governance features (Agent Gateway, Resource Access Certifications)

What remains hard

  • Infrastructure at scale100M users on one platform
  • Integration maintenanceOkta Integration Network
  • Brand trustGartner® has recognized Okta as a Leader in the 2025 Magic Quadrant™ for Access Management.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 40 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted identity & access service using Node.js (NestJS) + Postgres + Redis + a React admin UI. Implement: (1) an OpenID Connect / OAuth2 authorization server (authorize, token, introspect, revoke); (2) a Universal Directory schema and REST API (users, groups, SCIM-compatible endpoints for provisioning); (3) MFA with TOTP and SMS/email via Twilio/SES; (4) SAML and OIDC app connector templates and a simple SSO demo app; (5) admin UI for user lifecycle, policy-based access, and audit logs; (6) a small gateway proxy that can broker short-lived credentials for non-human agents. Out of scope: enterprise-grade threat detection, global multi-region scaling, formal compliance attestations (SOC2, FedRAMP), and a massive prebuilt integration catalogue. Include robust error handling, logging, unit and integration tests, and deployment scripts for Docker Compose and one-cloud (e.g., AWS ECS or DigitalOcean).
How we checked5 sources · 1/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 1 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the middle of them✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page