Creator and commerce decision

Nolt

A competent developer can build and host a useful Nolt replacement (public board, voting, comments, embeds) in about a week; pay Nolt for enterprise SSO, AI moderation, integrations, SLA and polish if you need those.

Visit website
You pay

$29/mo

$348/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$50one-off30 h to build

$25/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Nolt alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Collect feedback posts, allow users to comment and upvote, surface high‑priority items on a public roadmap, and publish changelog updates.

What it still won’t have

  • AI-assisted automated moderation (Enterprise feature)
  • Hosted SLA, priority support and enterprise compliance guarantees
  • Built-in 2-way integrations and many out-of-the-box connectors
  • Brand polish, UX refinements, and multi-board management at scale

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 2 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a single-board public feedback app using Next.js, Postgres (Supabase), and Redis for rate-limits. Implement: (1) public board page showing posts sorted by score, (2) post submission form and embeddable widget (iframe + small JS snippet), (3) comment threads and upvote/downvote endpoints, (4) admin dashboard to change status, merge posts, and publish roadmap/changelog items, (5) webhooks and CSV export endpoint. Exclude enterprise SAML/SCIM, advanced analytics, and paid-tier SLA. Provide basic duplicate detection, profanity filtering, error handling, and automated tests (unit + integration). Document deployment steps and a one-click Docker/Heroku or Vercel + Supabase setup.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 93

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score93

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded