Websites and hosting decision

NETTIFY

A competent developer can build a usable AI-assisted site generator + editor and host it (prior art like Webstudio and Hugo lower effort), but replicating Nettify's managed hosting polish, Vipps/payment plumbing, domain management and ongoing SEO/support is operationally heavier — so a partial self-hosted replacement is realistic, the full paid product less so.

Visit website
You pay

$399/mo

$4,788/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off100 h to build

$50/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All NETTIFY alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Prompt an LLM to generate site structure and copy, render pages in an editor with live preview, publish static/SSR pages to hosting with HTTPS/DNS, collect and store lead form submissions and send email notifications, and surface basic analytics (visitors, active users, top pages).

What it still won’t have

  • Managed hosting, SLA and platform polish
  • Built-in Norwegian payments (Vipps) and prewired courier integrations
  • Domain registration included and managed for you
  • Ongoing SEO service (monthly managed SEO)
  • Vendor support and delivered 'we do it for you' plan

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted website-builder: use Next.js for the frontend and editor, a Node.js API with PostgreSQL for persistence, and Vercel or DigitalOcean for hosting (static export + optional serverless functions). Core features in scope: 1) LLM-backed site generator endpoint (call OpenAI-compatible API) that produces page templates and copy from a short prompt; 2) WYSIWYG editor with live preview and save to Postgres; 3) publish workflow that exports a static site and deploys it (or serves SSR) with automated HTTPS and DNS helpers; 4) lead form handling with inbox, CSV/JSON export and email notifications via SMTP or SendGrid; 5) lightweight analytics collecting pageviews and active users; include error handling, input validation, unit tests for API endpoints, and integration tests for the publish flow. Out of scope: payment provider integration (Vipps), managed SEO retainer, and a white-glove 'we build it for you' service.
How we checked4 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded