Health, home and travel decision

MyTrainer

A capable developer can build a useful AI-backed workout planner and tracker, but reproducing the polished mobile UX, media library, and ongoing AI/chat quality of the paid app is multi-week work and would lack the production polish and App Store readiness the commercial product provides.

View on the App Store
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$100/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All MyTrainer alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • User onboarding chat -> generate personalized plan -> present workout session with exercises/video/timings -> track session results and progress -> adjust plans (monthly check-in or on-demand) -> sync with Apple Health and send reminders

What it still won’t have

  • Polished, production-quality mobile UX and App Store distribution work
  • Curated exercise video library and in-app media hosting
  • Ongoing app updates, localization, and small-bug polish evident in release notes
  • Existing user reviews, brand and developer support channels
  • Refinements in AI conversation quality and training/tuning not included in a quick build

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

MyTrainer does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a single-developer iOS app (SwiftUI + Combine, backend Node.js + Postgres on a small VPS) that provides an AI-driven personal trainer prototype. In scope: (1) a chat-style onboarding that stores user profile, equipment and goals; (2) a rule-based plan generator that emits a week's workouts (exercise id, sets, reps, rest) and simple meal/macros targets; (3) a workout session screen with exercise list, timers, and ability to log sets; (4) a Postgres schema for users, workouts, sessions, and progress and a monthly check-in job to adjust plan parameters; (5) Apple HealthKit read (steps/sleep/activity) and write (workout summaries) integration; (6) push/local reminders. Out of scope: exercise video production and hosting, advanced ML model training, multi-user billing, App Store release tasks, and complex nutrition recipe management. Include error handling, authentication, unit tests for plan generation and API routes, and end-to-end tests for the onboarding -> plan -> session flow.
How we checked3 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded