Websites and hosting decision

Memberstack

A single engineer can build a useful auth+Stripe gating MVP, but reproducing Memberstack's compliance, integrations, and production-scale infrastructure is expensive and time-consuming, so keeping the SaaS is reasonable for production needs.

Visit website
You pay

$29/mo

$348/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$0/mo8 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Provide member signup/login, attach members to paid plans via Stripe, and gate content based on member plans.

What it still won’t have

  • SOC 2 / compliance certifications and audit reports
  • Decades of production-hardening and scale (fraud monitoring, uptime SLAs)
  • Built-in branded email campaigns and native email sending platform
  • Existing third-party integrations and plugins ecosystem
  • Operational burden of handling payment disputes and edge-case billing scenarios

What remains hard

  • Compliance and regulationSOC 2 TYPE 1 CERTIFIED
  • Infrastructure at scale$200M+ processed
  • Infrastructure at scale10M+ member accounts managed
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal membership backend using Node.js (Express), Postgres (managed like Supabase or RDS), and Stripe for payments. Core features in scope: secure email/password auth (signup, login, reset, email verification), Stripe subscription and webhook handling (create customer, subscribe to plans, handle invoice.payment_succeeded and invoice.payment_failed), member profile storage with custom fields in Postgres, a small admin dashboard (list/search/export members, change/cancel subscriptions), and a client-side script to gate pages/elements and expose current member state to the frontend. Out of scope: full email campaign builder, enterprise SSO, SOC 2 audit, and multi-tenant scaling. Require input validation, webhook signature verification, error handling, unit tests for API handlers, and basic E2E tests for signup→payment→gating flow. Deploy to a single managed server (or Vercel) and use managed Postgres and Stripe; include a README with setup, environment variables, and data migration/export instructions.
How we checked3 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 24

How the score was reached

  • Pay verdict base20
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-6
  • Evidence score24

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 3 moats quoted from the page