Analytics and monitoring decision

Maze

A capable developer can build a usable in-product prompt system and dashboard in a week, but you cannot realistically reproduce Maze’s pooled panel, SOC 2 compliance, or enterprise AI/reporting features without significant additional investment.

Visit website
Subscription$99/month
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep6 hours + $0
Evidence3/3 runs agree

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • Show a small prompt in a customer webpage, capture responses, store them, and surface results in a simple dashboard.

What it still won’t have

  • Access to Maze’s pooled panel of millions of participants for paid recruitment
  • Enterprise-grade compliance attestation (e.g., SOC 2 Type II) and associated assurances
  • Maze AI automated reports, transcripts, and built-in AI study builder
  • Deep integrations and recruitment/participant-management features advertised as platform-wide

What remains hard

  • Marketplace liquidityInstantly tap into our panel of over 6 million participants or connect with your own community.
  • Compliance and regulationWe’re SOC 2 Type II certified—so you can focus on unlocking insights without worrying about your data protection.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal in-product prompts service using Next.js (React) for the dashboard and a small embeddable JS snippet, Node.js + Express for the API, and Postgres (hosted on Supabase) for storage. In scope: snippet that triggers prompts by URL pattern, configurable prompt templates (NPS/CSAT/screener), server endpoints to receive responses, storage schema for prompts/exposures/answers, a dashboard to create prompts, view/filter responses, and CSV export. Out of scope: participant recruitment marketplace, SOC2 compliance audit, advanced AI analysis. Include error handling, input validation, basic auth for the dashboard, and automated tests for API endpoints and UI flows.
How we checked3 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 21

How the score was reached

  • Pay verdict base20
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-6
  • Evidence score21

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! Price not confirmed on the page — this pricing page renders its price in the browser✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 2 moats quoted from the page