Analytics and monitoring decision

Mad Dog Alpha AI

A single developer can build a narrow AI report generator (data ingestion + LLM + UI) in about a week, but reproducing a full commercial equity-research product (curated data licenses, proprietary models, polished UX, and integrations) is unlikely without additional resources.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off40 h to build

$200/mo3 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Mad Dog Alpha AI alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Ingest market and company data, run an LLM to generate research and summaries, store and index reports, and serve them via a web UI with simple account access

What it still won’t have

  • proprietary data licensing and curated market feeds
  • any proprietary or fine-tuned models the vendor may use
  • production polish, dashboards, and polished UX
  • broad integrations (brokerage, research distribution) and scale infrastructure

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Mad Dog Alpha AI does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal AI equity-research web app using Node.js (Express) backend, Postgres for storage, a React frontend, and an LLM API (e.g., OpenAI) for report generation. Core features: 1) fetch and normalize price and fundamentals from public APIs, 2) prompt the LLM to produce an executive summary and structured report for a single ticker on demand, 3) store raw inputs, prompts, and generated reports in Postgres with full-text search, 4) a React UI to request reports, view history, and trigger refresh, 5) a scheduled job to refresh data and optionally regenerate reports. Out of scope: fine-tuning proprietary models, paid market data licensing, multi-user billing, broker integrations, and advanced analytics dashboards. Include error handling for API failures, retries for jobs, unit tests for core data and generation logic, and end-to-end tests for the report flow.
How we checked3 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 64

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 3 cited sources+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score64

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 3

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded