Project and task management decision

Lunatask

A minimal encrypted tasks-and-notes web service is achievable by a capable developer given open-source building blocks, but matching Lunatask’s native apps, polish, integrations, and cross-platform distribution requires substantially more effort and ongoing operations.

Visit website
You pay

$8/mo

$96/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$50/mo10 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 8 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Lunatask alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Client-side encrypted tasks/notes with user accounts, persistent sync to a simple backend, basic calendar integration, and a habit tracker UI.

What it still won’t have

  • Polished native mobile apps (iOS/Android) and App Store distribution
  • Advanced UX polish and extensive built-in prioritization workflows (Eisenhower, Must/Should/Want, Kanban polish)
  • Built-in integrations and App Store/Play Store presence (push notifications reliability)
  • Slack community, existing user base and app-store ratings

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 8 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal encrypted task-and-notes web app using Next.js (React) for the client, Node.js + Express for the API, and Postgres for storage. Scope: email/password accounts, client-side end-to-end encryption (Web Crypto + argon2 for key derivation), CRUD for tasks/notes/habits stored as encrypted blobs, per-user sync endpoints with optimistic versioning, OAuth calendar integration for read-only calendar events (Google/Outlook), basic web UI for list/kanban/habit view, and server-side scheduled reminders via a cron worker. Out of scope: native mobile apps, App Store packaging, advanced prioritization algorithms, analytics, and a public marketplace. Include error handling, input validation, and automated tests for API endpoints and encryption round-trips.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded