Forms and surveys decision

LogicForm

A technically capable developer can build a useful, lower-polish replacement (forms, logic, OpenAI analysis) in a few hundred hours, but matching the full hosted product (collaboration polish, analytics UX, and operational polish) is larger work — consider self-hosting LimeSurvey/SurveyJS for closer parity or pay $9.99/mo for the managed convenience.

Visit website
You pay

$9.99/mo

$120/yr

Read off the official pricing page.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off110 h to build

$50/mo6 h/mo upkeep

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 6 seats.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All LogicForm alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Create surveys with pages/questions and skip-logic, collect responses via shareable links or embedded surveys, run AI analysis over long text answers, and export responses.

What it still won’t have

  • Polished UI/UX and product polish
  • Built-in branding, custom domain handling, and hosted telemetry
  • Guaranteed uptime, support, and SLAs
  • Any proprietary operational optimizations or scale infrastructure
  • Enterprise billing, discounts, and marketplace exposure

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying is—cheaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 6 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hostable survey builder using Next.js + React for the frontend, Node.js/Express for the API, and Postgres for storage. Implement: 1) a page/question editor with conditional skip-logic persisted as JSON; 2) a public survey renderer and embeddable iframe endpoint; 3) response storage and CSV export; 4) an AI analysis worker that batches long-text answers to the OpenAI API and stores generated insights; 5) basic real-time collaboration (presence and simple locking) via WebSocket or Firebase; 6) auth (email) and account-level settings. Out of scope: full WYSIWYG drag-and-drop layout editor, enterprise billing, advanced clickmap heatmaps, and multi-tenant billing integration. Provide error handling, retries for API calls, input validation, unit and integration tests, and Docker-based deployment scripts.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded