Project and task management decision

Linear

A technical user can build a usable issue tracker and project board in a week and run it cheaply, but reproducing Linear's AI agent platform, enterprise features, polished UX, and brand-backed scale is impractical for a small DIY effort.

Visit website
Subscription$10/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep6 hours + $0
Evidence3/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Track issues and projects (create/edit issues, move across boards, view cycles and simple analytics) without Linear's AI agents or enterprise features.

What it still won’t have

  • Linear Agent and other AI/agent workflows (coded agent platform)
  • Coding sessions, Loops, Code Intelligence and other AI features
  • Enterprise features (SAML/SCIM, audit logs, SLAs, account management)
  • Scale/production hardening, uptime SLA, and priority support
  • Built integrations & polished product UX

What remains hard

  • Brand trustLinear powers over 40,000 product teams.
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal self-hosted issue and project tracker using Node.js (Express), Postgres, and React. Implement: REST API for issues/projects/cycles (CRUD + filtering), Postgres schema and migrations, React UI with issue list, issue detail, board (drag to move status), project roadmap view, user auth via GitHub OAuth and basic team ACLs, background worker for email/webhook notifications, and webhooks API. Exclude: AI agents, enterprise SSO/SCIM, advanced analytics, and commercial integrations. Include error handling, input validation, and automated tests for API endpoints and basic UI flows. Provide Docker Compose for local dev and a simple production deploy guide (Heroku/GCP).
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page