Writing and content decision

Laper

A small team can realistically build the core screenplay editor, parser, AI-call flow, and CRDT collaboration, but reproducing Laper's full hosted product (branded assistant models, generation credits, high-speed pipelines, community/publishing features, and polished UX) would take much more time and resources.

Visit website
Subscription$20/month ✓ verified
Initial build80 hours
Monthly upkeep6 hours + $100
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Laper alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Edit screenplay text in an editor → parse screenplay into scenes/characters/beats → call an LLM-based analysis endpoint to return structure/notes → show notes inline and update structured views → persist document and sync collaborators.

What it still won’t have

  • Proprietary generation/prompting optimizations and branded assistant models (e.g., Laper IMAX/16mm)
  • Built-in credit/asset generation pipeline and high-speed dedicated generation channels
  • Product polish, docs, and frequent shipping cadence (the site claims ~20 improvements/week)
  • Integrated community/publishing features and hosted originals library

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 6 seats.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal AI-assisted screenwriting editor using React (Next.js), a Postgres database, a Node/Express API, and a CRDT library (Yjs) for realtime sync. Implement: 1) a Fountain/FDX parser that extracts scenes/characters/beats and a formatter that preserves industry layout; 2) a rich editor UI that applies screenplay formatting and supports inline comments; 3) an AI orchestration endpoint that accepts a selected scene or range, calls a configurable LLM API (OpenAI/Anthropic) and returns structured notes (scene diagnosis, character pressure, beats); 4) persistent project/version storage and import/export (Fountain/FDX); 5) CRDT-based realtime collaboration and simple access controls. Out of scope: built-in image/video generation, custom LLM training, a paid subscription system, and a public publishing library. Include error handling for network/LLM failures, retries, and unit/integration tests for parser, API, and CRDT sync.
How we checked4 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 63

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 4 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Evidence score63

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 4

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded