Automation and integrations decision

Keyboard Maestro

A capable developer can build a useful subset (hotkeys, basic actions, scheduler, clipboard history) over several weeks, but reproducing Keyboard Maestro's large built-in action library, polish, and community support is impractical for a single developer.

Visit website
You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off80 h to build

$0/mo5 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need - the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship. All Keyboard Maestro alternatives, with the arithmetic →

What a replacement has to do

  • Listen for a hotkey or schedule, run a sequence of actions (keystrokes, scripts, window management, clipboard operations), allow user to author simple macros and save them locally.

What it still won’t have

  • Hundreds of Built-In Actions (predefined action library)
  • Active forum support
  • New Macro Wizard and security settings UI

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Keyboard Maestro does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a minimal macOS native automation app in Swift (SwiftUI for UI, Combine for async) that: (1) listens for global hotkeys and scheduled triggers; (2) stores macros as JSON on disk and exposes a simple editor to add/remove steps; (3) supports action types: run shell command, run AppleScript, send keystrokes, manipulate clipboard, and basic window arrangement; (4) includes a clipboard history and text-snippet expansion; (5) provides simple logging, error handling for failed actions, and unit tests for the macro storage and action runner. Out of scope: reproducing the full catalogue of built-in actions, polished commercial UI, forum, licensing/payment flow, and OCR/image-based triggers.
How we checked5 sources · 3/3 runs agreed · evidence score 67

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 5 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • 3/3 assessment runs agreed+4
  • Evidence score67

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 5

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ 3 independent runs, one answer✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded