Forms and surveys decision

involve.me

A focused replacement that provides embeddable quizzes, formula-based pricing, contact capture, email sequences and basic analytics is realistic for a small team in ~1 week, but reproducing the full product (AI Agent, extensive integrations, templates, payments, polished editor, and vendor SOC2 compliance) is not practical without significant ongoing effort.

Visit website
Subscription$49/month ✓ verified
Initial build30 hours
Monthly upkeep5 hours + $25
Evidence2/3 runs agree

Open-source builds that already do this

Every project below is open source and already does this job today. Fork one, self-host it, or take the parts you need — the build prompt further down assumes an empty file, and this is the shortcut past that. Licences differ; check the one on each card before you ship.

What a replacement has to do

  • Collect answers via embeddable quiz/calculator → compute score/price via formulas & conditional logic → store contact and submission → send personalized email sequence → view simple analytics

What it still won’t have

  • drag-and-drop editor and prebuilt templates
  • AI Agent that builds/edits funnels by chat
  • 55+ native integrations and one-click connectors
  • A/B testing, built-in payments integrations, and polished analytics
  • SOC 2® Type II compliance (vendor attestation)

What remains hard

  • Compliance and regulationBig security milestone: involve.me is now SOC 2® Type II compliant
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

Keep paying

Paying ischeaper in year one.

On cash alone, building overtakes the subscription at 1 seat.

Paid seatsseats

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it

AI build APIs + hosting

Time you would spend

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build a self-hosted embeddable quiz-and-calculator service using Next.js (Node) + Postgres + Tailwind for minimal UI. Core features in scope: (1) a JSON-based quiz schema (steps, questions, answer values, conditional routing), (2) an embeddable JS widget that loads a quiz by ID and posts submissions to the backend, (3) a server-side formula evaluator to compute scores/prices, (4) contact/submission storage in Postgres and a simple contacts API, (5) an email sequencer that triggers templated emails via SendGrid with branching based on answers/score, and (6) a basic analytics endpoint and a small dashboard that shows submissions and funnel drop-off. Out of scope: full drag-and-drop visual editor, AI generation, 3rd-party integrations beyond webhooks, SOC2 compliance, and payment processing. Include robust error handling, input validation, server-side tests (unit for formula evaluator and integration for submission flow), and documentation for embedding and webhook usage.
How we checked6 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 60

How the score was reached

  • Partly verdict base52
  • An open-source build was found+5
  • 6 cited sources+3
  • Price verified on pricing page+3
  • Hard moats found in the evidence-3
  • Evidence score60

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time — so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 6

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

✓ Price read off the page! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat quoted from the page