Uncategorised decision

Indieworldmap

A single competent developer can reproduce the core site (interactive globe, browse, submit, basic moderation) in about a week; there are no evident durable moats on the product pages to require buying.

Visit website

Built by Yuyu, who ships 11 products in this index

You pay

Not priced

No pricing page we fetched carried a figure, so there is nothing to compare against. The build side is still real.

You’d pay instead

$100one-off34 h to build

$30/mo6 h/mo upkeep

No published price to break even against.

No open-source build does this yet

Nothing published replaces this one, so a replacement starts from an empty file. Here is what it would have to cover.

What a replacement has to do

  • User opens a 3D globe, discovers product pins, clicks a pin to view details, and optionally submits a new product via a form.

What it still won’t have

  • Existing site SEO and domain age
  • Any established user community and existing product listings
  • Brand recognition and any proprietary editorial curation

What remains hard

  • Product polish and ongoing maintenance
Read the build prompt

First-year cost

No published price

Indieworldmap does not publish a price we could read, so there is nothing to compare against. What building costs is below.

Money you would actually spend

Keep paying
—

Subscription price × seats × 12

Build it
—

AI build —APIs + hosting —

Time you would spend

—

—

What you would spend

What we assumed

The verdict above measures whether you could build it. This one is only about money.

Runnable build prompt

Not run yet
Build an interactive Indie World Map clone using a React frontend (Vite), Three.js (or deck.gl) for a 3D globe, a Node.js + Express API, and Postgres for storage. Core features in scope: render globe with clickable pins, product detail pages, product submission form with validation and reCAPTCHA, server-side moderation endpoint, basic search/filter by tag and proximity, and email notifications on submission. Out of scope: payments, complex analytics, user accounts/social features. Provide error handling, basic unit/integration tests, Dockerfiles for frontend/backend, and a deployment guide for a single VPS or managed host (e.g., DigitalOcean).
How we checked1 sources · 2/3 runs agreed · evidence score 78

How the score was reached

  • Build verdict base78
  • Evidence score78

The base comes from the verdict. Everything under it is a check that either happened or did not, and each one is a fact frozen in this record rather than a judgement made at render time - so the same evidence always produces the same number.

How scoring works →

Cited sources · 1

Every page the run actually retrieved.

Integrity checks

What held up, and what did not.

! 2 of 3 runs agreed; the verdict is the majority✓ Citations limited to fetched pages! 1 moat recorded